There are those who maintain that you can’t demand anything of the reader. They say the reader knows nothing about art, and that if you are going to reach him, you have to be humble enough to descend to his level. This supposes either that the aim of art is to teach, which it is not, or that to create anything which is simply a good-in-itself is a waste of time. Art never responds to the wish to make it democratic; it is not for everybody; it is only for those who are willing to undergo the effort needed to understand it. We hear a great deal about humility being required to lower oneself, but it requires an equal humility and a real love of the truth to raise oneself and by hard labor to acquire higher standards.
Flannery O’Connor, Mystery and Manners. Catholic Novelists and Their Readers, quoted by Ms. Odradek. As is often the case, O’Connor settles this discussion for me. (via mills) (via caille)

msodradek

87 notes

Show

  1. sottolestelleforever reblogged this from tikilights
  2. eyesacrosstheavenue reblogged this from kendalllouise
  3. kendalllouise reblogged this from mills
  4. marieyall reblogged this from bailums
  5. blueberrybridges reblogged this from deadliftpoetry
  6. bailums reblogged this from nakaonwood
  7. gouachegalatea reblogged this from sympathyfortheartgallery
  8. goo22 reblogged this from afterimg
  9. afterimg reblogged this from oversets
  10. deadliftpoetry reblogged this from mills
  11. jcpetela reblogged this from mills
  12. babyhands reblogged this from bamboozles
  13. flatteryoconnor reblogged this from msodradek
  14. philleif reblogged this from sympathyfortheartgallery
  15. fayeuhngnihnwah reblogged this from buongiorno
  16. aarontmccoy reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
  17. tragos reblogged this from mills
  18. nakaonwood reblogged this from caille
  19. cenizasyarena reblogged this from mills
  20. sometimesagreatnotion reblogged this from mills

Blog comments powered by Disqus